A Unified Interpretation of the Varieties of False Pleasure in Plato's Philebeus

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Most commentators think that Plato's account of the varieties of false pleasure is disjointed and that various types of false pleasure he identifies are false in different ways. It really doesn't look that way to me: I think that the discussion is unified, and that Plato starts with less difficult cases to build up to a point about more important but less clear cases. In this paper, I do my best to show how this might work. I don't think I will ever work on this again: the experience of writing this paper and dealing with frustrating refereeing practices has led me to pretty much switch to aesthetics. I'm much happier. But here are the fruits of my labor. I know there are a few details I got wrong (in particular a place or two where I should have scrutinized Frede's translation more closely), but I still think that I'm on the right track. I hope it's useful to someone.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STRAUI-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-09-14

Total views
75 ( #39,232 of 52,730 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #41,099 of 52,730 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.