Knowledge of objective modality

Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1155-1175 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The epistemology of modality has focused on metaphysical modality and, more recently, counterfactual conditionals. Knowledge of kinds of modality that are not metaphysical has so far gone largely unexplored. Yet other theoretically interesting kinds of modality, such as nomic, practical, and ‘easy’ possibility, are no less puzzling epistemologically. Could Clinton easily have won the 2016 presidential election—was it an easy possibility? Given that she didn’t in fact win the election, how, if at all, can we know whether she easily could have? This paper investigates the epistemology of the broad category of ‘objective’ modality, of which metaphysical modality is a special, limiting case. It argues that the same cognitive mechanisms that are capable of producing knowledge of metaphysical modality are also capable of producing knowledge of all other objective modalities. This conclusion can be used to explain the roles of counterfactual reasoning and the imagination in the epistemology of objective modality.
Reprint years
2018, 2019
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STRKOO-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-11-01
Latest version: 7 (2018-03-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
To Be F Is To Be G.Cian Dorr - 2016 - Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):39-134.
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-11-01

Total views
524 ( #5,634 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #9,125 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.