Modal Humeanism and Arguments from Possibility

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (3pt3):391-401 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Sider (2011, 2013) proposes a reductive analysis of metaphysical modality—‘(modal) Humeanism’—and goes on to argue that it has interesting epistemological and methodological implications. In particular, Humeanism is supposed to undermine a class of ‘arguments from possibility’, which includes Sider's (1993) own argument against mereological nihilism and Chalmers's (1996) argument against physicalism. I argue that Sider's arguments do not go through, and moreover that we should instead expect Humeanism to be compatible with the practice of arguing from possibility in philosophy
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Parthood.Sider, Theodore

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Epistemology of Modality.Strohminger, Margot & Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
490 ( #5,758 of 41,604 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #8,023 of 41,604 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.