The buck passing account of value: assessing the negative thesis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The buck-passing account of value involves a positive and a negative claim. The positive claim is that to be good is to have reasons for a pro-attitude. The negative claim is that goodness itself is not a reason for a pro-attitude. Unlike Scanlon, Parfit rejects the negative claim. He maintains that goodness is reason-providing, but that the reason provided is not an additional reason, additional, that is, to the reason provided by the good-making property. I consider various ways in which this may be understood and reject all of them. So I conclude that buck-passers cannot reject the negative claim.
Categories
Reprint years
2016, 2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STRTBP-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 90 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-04-21

Total views
589 ( #4,537 of 42,170 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
146 ( #2,841 of 42,170 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.