The mechanism—the secret—of the given

Synthese 199 (3-4):10909-10928 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is, of course, The Given: what is given in experience. The ‘Myth Of The Given’ is just a wrong answer to the question ‘What is given?’ This paper offers a brief sketch of three possible right answers. It examines an early account by Charles Augustus Strong of why The Myth is a myth. It maintains that a natural and naturalistic version of empiricism is compatible with the fact that the Myth is a myth. It gives proper place to enactivist considerations. It is ) broadly in line with the Sellarsian view as refined by John McDowell. It meets an important constraint: acknowledging the reality of something that seems at first to lend support to The Myth—i.e. the fact that we can engage in ‘non-inferential self-attribution of … sensations’ —without in any way succumbing to the Myth.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-12-04
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
381 ( #20,741 of 71,165 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #23,753 of 71,165 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.