Long-Term Potentiation: One Kind or Many?

In Eppur Si Muove: Doing History and Philosophy of Science with Peter Machamer, A Collection of Essays in Honor of Peter Machamer. Springer Verlag. pp. 127-140 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Do neurobiologists aim to discover natural kinds? I address this question in this chapter via a critical analysis of classification practices operative across the 43-year history of research on long-term potentiation (LTP). I argue that this 43-year history supports the idea that the structure of scientific practice surrounding LTP research has remained an obstacle to the discovery of natural kinds.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SULLPO
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-05-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Thinking About Mechanisms.Machamer, Peter K.; Darden, Lindley & Craver, Carl F.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-05-08

Total views
81 ( #27,928 of 41,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #14,189 of 41,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.