Better Foundations for Subjective Probability

Australasian Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How do we ascribe subjective probability? In decision theory, this question is often addressed by representation theorems, going back to Ramsey (1926), which tell us how to define or measure subjective probability by observable preferences. However, standard representation theorems make strong rationality assumptions, in particular expected utility maximization. How do we ascribe subjective probability to agents which do not satisfy these strong rationality assumptions? I present a representation theorem with weak rationality assumptions which can be used to define or measure subjective probability for partly irrational agents.

Author's Profile

Sven Neth
University of Pittsburgh

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-15

Downloads
306 (#52,717)

6 months
306 (#6,734)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?