Is Aerosol Geoengineering Ethically Preferable to Other Climate Change Strategies?

Ethics and the Environment 17 (2):111-135 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I address the question of whether aerosol geoengineering (AG) ought to be deployed as a response to climate change. First, I distinguish AG from emissions mitigation, adaptation, and other geoengineering strategies. Second, I discuss advantages and disadvantages of AG, including its potential to result in substantial harm to some persons. Third, I critique three arguments against AG deployment, suggesting reasons why these arguments should be rejected. Fourth, I consider an argument that, in scenarios in which all available climate change strategies would result in net harm to persons, we ought to adopt that response to climate change which would result in the least net harm. I suggest that under ..
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Geoengineering and Non-Ideal Theory.Morrow, David R. & Svoboda, Toby

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
426 ( #7,787 of 43,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #20,672 of 43,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.