Czy współczesne nauki przyrodnicze mogą inspirować filozoficzny i teologiczny namysł nad przyczynowością?

Scientia et Fides 6 (2):147-180 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Can Contemporary Science Inspire Philosophical and Theological Reflection on Causality? The cooperation between natural science, philosophy, and theology in an analysis of the causal structure and co-dependency of entities in the universe seems to be both legitimate and expected. It turns out, however, that in practice it oftentimes raises some tensions, questions and difficulties, leading to the development of alternative and in a sense competitive models of causality and of God’s action in the world. What is more, the attitude of natural sciences since modernity, concentrated on gaining knowledge about natural phenomena to predict and control them, without trying to determine the nature of their ultimate causes, Humean criticism and rejection of the concept of causality as such, and concentration of analytic philosophers on the description of what accompanies phenomena classified as causal, leaving aside the question of the metaphysical status of causes and effects – they all seem to make impossible an interaction and mutual reference of contemporary science, philosophy, and theology in their reflection on the topic of causation. The main goal of this article is to defend the thesis about the possible and actual influence of scientific analysis of cause and effect relationships on the philosophical and theological reflection on causation, not only in the Middle Ages and Modernity, but also in contemporary thought. The presentation of the latest positions in the debate on divine action in the natural world will be followed by an argument in favor of the relevance of the model developed by philosophers and theologians representing the Thomistic school.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Williamson, Timothy
Getting Causes From Powers.Mumford, Stephen & Anjum, Rani Lill
The Structure of Objects.Koslicki, Kathrin

View all 54 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
57 ( #40,730 of 50,224 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #39,296 of 50,224 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.