A Priori and A Posteriori: A Bootstrapping Relationship

Metaphysica 12 (2):151-164 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The distinction between a priori and a posteriori knowledge has been the subject of an enormous amount of discussion, but the literature is biased against recognizing the intimate relationship between these forms of knowledge. For instance, it seems to be almost impossible to find a sample of pure a priori or a posteriori knowledge. In this paper, it will be suggested that distinguishing between a priori and a posteriori is more problematic than is often suggested, and that a priori and a posteriori resources are in fact used in parallel. We will define this relationship between a priori and a posteriori knowledge as the bootstrapping relationship. As we will see, this relationship gives us reasons to seek for an altogether novel definition of a priori and a posteriori knowledge. Specifically, we will have to analyse the relationship between a priori knowledge and a priori reasoning , and it will be suggested that the latter serves as a more promising starting point for the analysis of aprioricity. We will also analyse a number of examples from the natural sciences and consider the role of a priori reasoning in these examples. The focus of this paper is the analysis of the concepts of a priori and a posteriori knowledge rather than the epistemic domain of a posteriori and a priori justification
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TAHAPA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-08-25

Total views
787 ( #2,629 of 40,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
141 ( #2,722 of 40,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.