A Priori or A Posteriori?

In Ricki Bliss & James Miller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. pp. 353-363 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article discusses the role of a priori and a posteriori knowledge and methods in metaphysics and metametaphysics. Issues discussed include the viability of the distinction, the continuity of a priori and a posteriori methods, connections to modal epistemology, and the role of the distinction for science and naturalistic metaphysics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TAHAPO
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-04-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-04-24

Total views
288 ( #17,606 of 54,429 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
174 ( #2,579 of 54,429 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.