A Priori or A Posteriori?

In Ricki Bliss & James Miller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. pp. 353-363 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article discusses the role of a priori and a posteriori knowledge and methods in metaphysics and metametaphysics. Issues discussed include the viability of the distinction, the continuity of a priori and a posteriori methods, connections to modal epistemology, and the role of the distinction for science and naturalistic metaphysics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TAHAPO
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-04-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-04-24

Total views
137 ( #28,000 of 50,149 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
137 ( #3,314 of 50,149 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.