Is Evidence of Evidence Evidence?

Noûs 51 (1):95-112 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We examine whether the "evidence of evidence is evidence" principle is true. We distinguish several different versions of the principle and evaluate recent attacks on some of those versions. We argue that, whatever the merits of those attacks, they leave the more important rendition of the principle untouched. That version is, however, also subject to new kinds of counterexamples. We end by suggesting how to formulate a better version of the principle that takes into account those new counterexamples.

Author Profiles

Juan Comesaña
Rutgers - New Brunswick
Eyal Tal
University of Arizona (PhD)


Added to PP

739 (#20,528)

6 months
115 (#35,836)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?