Как прийти к правильному решению? К интерпретации эпистемологического определения метода сравнения у аристотеля и экклесиаста

Schole 12 (1):72-85 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The author reveals a fundamentally significant parallel in the definitions of the method of cognition through a comparison of things and essences, attested in Aristotle’s “Eudemian Ethics” and in Ecclesiastes. With this particular attention is paid to the consideration of the semantic field of key terms used in the corresponding formulations. The examples of Ecclesiastes's application of the methodology of cognition developed by him demonstrate that his “pessimistic” and “skeptical” statements are only judgments with which sometimes directly opposite premises are compared in the process of his reasoning, which results in rather optimistic conclusions; so that the “inconsistency” of Ecclesiastes proves to be only seeming.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-07-09
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #59,703 of 2,448,659 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #62,696 of 2,448,659 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.