God and eternal boredom

Religious Studies 53 (1):51-70 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

God is thought to be eternal. Does this mean that he is timeless? Or is he, rather, omnitemporal? In this paper we want to show that God cannot be omnitemporal. Our starting point, which we take from Bernard Williams’ article on the Makropulos Case, is the intuition that it is inappropriate for persons not to become bored after a sufficiently long sequence of time has passed. If God were omnitemporal, he would suffer from boredom. But God is the greatest possible being and therefore cannot be bored. God, hence, is not omnitemporal. After the presentation of our argument, we address several objections by examining possible differences between human and divine persons.

Author Profiles

Attila Tanyi
University of Tromsø
Vuko Andrić
Linkoping University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-27

Downloads
896 (#14,488)

6 months
104 (#36,012)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?