God and eternal boredom

Religious Studies 53 (1):51-70 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
God is thought to be eternal. Does this mean that he is timeless? Or is he, rather, omnitemporal? In this paper we want to show that God cannot be omnitemporal. Our starting point, which we take from Bernard Williams’ article on the Makropulos Case, is the intuition that it is inappropriate for persons not to become bored after a sufficiently long sequence of time has passed. If God were omnitemporal, he would suffer from boredom. But God is the greatest possible being and therefore cannot be bored. God, hence, is not omnitemporal. After the presentation of our argument, we address several objections by examining possible differences between human and divine persons.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TANGAE-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2016-02-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-07-27

Total views
582 ( #7,379 of 53,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #12,000 of 53,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.