God and eternal boredom

Religious Studies 53 (1):51-70 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
God is thought to be eternal. Does this mean that he is timeless? Or is he, rather, omnitemporal? In this paper we want to show that God cannot be omnitemporal. Our starting point, which we take from Bernard Williams’ article on the Makropulos Case, is the intuition that it is inappropriate for persons not to become bored after a sufficiently long sequence of time has passed. If God were omnitemporal, he would suffer from boredom. But God is the greatest possible being and therefore cannot be bored. God, hence, is not omnitemporal. After the presentation of our argument, we address several objections by examining possible differences between human and divine persons.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2016-02-13)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Moral Saints.Wolf, Susan
Well-Being.Crisp, Roger
Immortality and Boredom.Fischer, John Martin & Mitchell-Yellin, Benjamin
Immortal Curiosity.Tanyi, Attila & Karlander, Karl

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
525 ( #7,016 of 47,276 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #14,246 of 47,276 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.