Luck, Institutions, and Global Distributive Justice

European Journal of Political Theory 10 (3):394-421 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Luck egalitarianism provides one powerful way of defending global egalitarianism. The basic luck egalitarian idea that persons ought not to be disadvantaged compared to others on account of his or her bad luck seems to extend naturally to the global arena, where random factors such as persons’ place of birth and the natural distribution of the world’s resources do affect differentially their life chances. Yet luck egalitarianism as an ideal, as well as its global application, has come under severe criticisms in recent debate. My aim in this article is to restore plausibility to the luck egalitarian idea, and to suggest how it could then provide a plausible grounding for global egalitarianism. To do this, I will propose a more modest but also more defensible conception of luck egalitarianism that can also strengthen the case for global distributive justice
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What is the Point of Equality?Anderson, Elizabeth S.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Zwei Ideale globaler Gleichheit.Heilinger, Jan-Christoph

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
500 ( #8,114 of 50,081 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #23,963 of 50,081 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.