On the Intrinsic Value of Genetic Integrity: A Commentary

Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):248-251 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In their article “Is There a Prima Facie Duty to Preserve Genetic Integrity in Conservation Biology?” Yasha Rower and Emma Harris argue that there is no underived prima facie obligation to preserve genetic integrity. In particular, it is argued that there is no such obligation because genetic integrity has no intrinsic value. In this commentary I raise doubts about this part of the authors’ argument. I argue that there might well be at least prima facie value in genetic integrity, that the Moorean isolation test the authors use might not work in their favour, and that connecting genetic integrity to the idea of identity might work against the authors’ argument.
Reprint years
2015
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TANOTI-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2016-02-13)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-20

Total views
140 ( #18,383 of 39,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #14,564 of 39,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.