On the Intrinsic Value of Genetic Integrity: A Commentary

Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):248-251 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In their article “Is There a Prima Facie Duty to Preserve Genetic Integrity in Conservation Biology?” Yasha Rower and Emma Harris argue that there is no underived prima facie obligation to preserve genetic integrity. In particular, it is argued that there is no such obligation because genetic integrity has no intrinsic value. In this commentary I raise doubts about this part of the authors’ argument. I argue that there might well be at least prima facie value in genetic integrity, that the Moorean isolation test the authors use might not work in their favour, and that connecting genetic integrity to the idea of identity might work against the authors’ argument.
Reprint years
2015
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TANOTI-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2016-02-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-09-20

Total views
237 ( #21,974 of 55,904 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #17,169 of 55,904 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.