Some problems in Piketty: An internal critique

Journal of Income Distribution 25 (2-4):101-118 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Piketty’s evidence on wealth distribution trends in Capital in the Twenty- First Century shows that – contra his own interpretation – there has been little rise in wealth inequality in Europe and America since the 1970s. This article relates that finding to the other principal trends in Piketty’s analysis: the capital/national income ratio trend, the capital-labor split of total incomes and the income inequality trend. Given that wealth inequality is not rising markedly, what can we deduce about the putative causes that might be operating upstream? Only the capital-labor split looks like a plausible explanation of the wealth inequality trend.

Author's Profile

Alan Tapper
Curtin University, Western Australia

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-02

Downloads
498 (#47,752)

6 months
129 (#34,175)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?