Some problems in Piketty: An internal critique

Journal of Income Distribution 25 (2-4):101-118 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Thomas Piketty’s evidence on wealth distribution trends in Capital in the Twenty- First Century shows that – contra his own interpretation – there has been little rise in wealth inequality in Europe and America since the 1970s. This article relates that finding to the other principal trends in Piketty’s analysis: the capital/national income ratio trend, the capital-labor split of total incomes and the income inequality trend. Given that wealth inequality is not rising markedly, what can we deduce about the putative causes that might be operating upstream? Only the capital-labor split looks like a plausible explanation of the wealth inequality trend.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TAPARF
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-05-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-05-02

Total views
77 ( #43,239 of 57,118 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #47,843 of 57,118 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.