Reid and Priestley on method and the mind

Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):511-525 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Reid said little in his published writings about his contemporary Joseph Priestley, but his unpublished work is largely devoted to the latter. Much of Priestley's philosophical thought- his materialism, his determinism, his Lockean scientific realism- was as antithetical to Reid's as was Hume's philosophy in a very different way. Neither Reid nor Priestley formulated a full response to the other. Priestley's response to Reid came very early in his career, and is marked by haste and immaturity. In his last decade Reid worried much about Priestley's materialism, but that concern never reached publication. I document Reid's unpublished response to Priestley, and also view Reid's response from Priestley's perspective, as deduced from his published works. Both thinkers attempted to base their arguments on Newtonian method. Reid's position is the more puzzling of the two, since he nowhere makes clear how Newtonian method favours mind-body dualism over materialism, which is the central debate between them
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TAPRAP
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-04-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #47,349 of 57,134 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #47,843 of 57,134 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.