Vive la Différence? Structural Diversity as a Challenge for Metanormative Theories

Ethics (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Decision-making under normative uncertainty requires an agent to aggregate the assessments of options given by rival normative theories into a single assessment that tells her what to do in light of her uncertainty. But what if the assessments of rival theories differ not just in their content but in their structure -- e.g., some are merely ordinal while others are cardinal? This paper describes and evaluates three general approaches to this "problem of structural diversity": structural enrichment, structural depletion, and multi-stage aggregation. All three approaches have notable drawbacks, but I tentatively defend multi-stage aggregation as least bad of the three.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TARVLD
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-05-22

Total views
207 ( #23,593 of 54,467 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
143 ( #3,375 of 54,467 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.