Subdeterminación, equivalencia empírica y realismo científico

Revista Legein 16 (junio 2013):63-72 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Two main theses of scientific realism —the epistemic thesis and the ontological thesis— are challenged by the underdetermination argument. Scientific realists deny the truth of the premises of this argument —particularly the thesis of the empirical equivalence among theories. But it can be shown that, even if that particular thesis were false, it is reasonable to be skeptic about the likelihood of the realistic theses.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
THISEE
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-01-10

Total views
201 ( #31,022 of 64,209 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #45,974 of 64,209 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.