Defeasible Conditionalization

Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):283-302 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The applicability of Bayesian conditionalization in setting one’s posterior probability for a proposition, α, is limited to cases where the value of a corresponding prior probability, PPRI(α|∧E), is available, where ∧E represents one’s complete body of evidence. In order to extend probability updating to cases where the prior probabilities needed for Bayesian conditionalization are unavailable, I introduce an inference schema, defeasible conditionalization, which allows one to update one’s personal probability in a proposition by conditioning on a proposition that represents a proper subset of one’s complete body of evidence. While defeasible conditionalization has wider applicability than standard Bayesian conditionalization (since it may be used when the value of a relevant prior probability, PPRI(α|∧E), is unavailable), there are circumstances under which some instances of defeasible conditionalization are unreasonable. To address this difficulty, I outline the conditions under which instances of defeasible conditionalization are defeated. To conclude the article, I suggest that the prescriptions of direct inference and statistical induction can be encoded within the proposed system of probability updating, by the selection of intuitively reasonable prior probabilities
PhilPapers/Archive ID
THODC
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Laws and Symmetry.van Fraassen, Bas C.
Betting on Theories.Maher, Patrick
The Logic of Decision.Jeffrey, Richard

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-01-25

Total views
221 ( #13,160 of 39,604 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #29,373 of 39,604 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.