Expert Judgment for Climate Change Adaptation

Philosophy of Science 83 (5):1110-1121 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Climate change adaptation is largely a local matter, and adaptation planning can benefit from local climate change projections. Such projections are typically generated by accepting climate model outputs in a relatively uncritical way. We argue, based on the IPCC’s treatment of model outputs from the CMIP5 ensemble, that this approach is unwarranted and that subjective expert judgment should play a central role in the provision of local climate change projections intended to support decision-making.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-01-14
Latest version: 3 (2016-01-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
426 ( #12,434 of 56,980 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #26,306 of 56,980 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.