The concepts of surveillance and sousveillance – a critical analysis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The concept of surveillance has recently been complimented by the concept of sousveillance. Neither term, however, has been rigorously defined, and it is particularly unclear how to understand and delimit sousveillance. This article sketches a generic definition of surveillance and proceeds to explore various ways in which we might define sousveillance, including power differentials, surreptitiousness, control, reciprocity, and moral valence. It argues that for each of these ways of defining it, sousveillance either fails to be distinct from surveillance or to provide a generally useful concept. As such, the article concludes that academics should avoid the neologism, and simply clarify what sense of surveillance is at stake when necessary.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-07-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #40,879 of 40,640 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #36,181 of 40,640 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.