Undercutting defeat via reference properties of differing arity: a reply to Pust

Analysis 71 (4):662-667 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a recent article, Joel Pust argued that direct inference based on reference properties of differing arity are incommensurable, and so direct inference cannot be used to resolve the Sleeping Beauty problem. After discussing the defects of Pust's argument, I offer reasons for thinking that direct inferences based on reference properties of differing arity are commensurable, and that we should prefer direct inferences based on logically stronger reference properties, regardless of arity
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
THOUDV
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-07-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-09-03

Total views
142 ( #33,441 of 58,210 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #54,354 of 58,210 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.