Of Animals, Robots and Men

Historical Social Research 40:70-91 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Domesticated animals need to be treated as fellow citizens: only if we conceive of domesticated animals as full members of our political communities can we do justice to their moral standing—or so Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka argue in their widely discussed book Zoopolis. In this contribution, we pursue two objectives. Firstly, we reject Donaldson and Kymlicka’s appeal for animal citizenship. We do so by submitting that instead of paying due heed to their moral status, regarding animals as citizens misinterprets their moral qualities and thus risks treating them unjustly. Secondly, we suggest that Donaldson and Kymlicka’s reinforced focus on membership should draw our attention to the moral standing of a further ‘species’, namely robots. Developments within artificial intelligence have advanced rapidly in recent years. With robots’ gaining ever greater capacities and abilities, we need to ask urgent questions about the moral ramifications of these technical advances.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TIEOAR
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights.Donaldson, Sue & Kymlicka, Will

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-02-05

Total views
42 ( #39,893 of 45,582 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #20,227 of 45,582 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.