Physical Objects and Moral Wrongness: Hume on the "Fallacy" in Wollaston's Moral Theory

Hume Studies 35 (1-2):87-101 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a well-known footnote in Book 3 of his Treatise of Human Nature, Hume calls William Wollaston's moral theory a "whimsical system" and purports to destroy it with a few brief objections. The first of those objections, although fatally flawed, has hitherto gone unrefuted. To my knowledge, its chief error has escaped attention. In this paper I expose that error; I also show that it has relevance beyond the present subject. It can occur with regard to any moral theory which, like Wollaston's, locates the wrongness of an act in a property that can reside in non-actions no less than in actions.
ISBN(s)
0319-7336
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TILPOA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-12-01

Total views
502 ( #7,169 of 46,328 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
71 ( #10,181 of 46,328 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.