A Case for Removing Confederate Monuments

In Bob Fischer (ed.), Ethics, Left and Right: The Moral Issues that Divide Us. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 513-522 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A particularly important, pressing, philosophical question concerns whether Confederate monuments ought to be removed. More precisely, one may wonder whether a certain group, viz. the relevant government officials and members of the public who together can remove the Confederate monuments, are morally obligated to (of their own volition) remove them. Unfortunately, academic philosophers have largely ignored this question. This paper aims to help rectify this oversight by moral philosophers. In it, I argue that people have a moral obligation to remove most, if not all, public Confederate monuments because of the unavoidable harm they inflict on undeserving persons. In the first section, I provide some relevant historical context. In the second section, I make my unique harm-based argument for the removal of Confederate monuments. In the third section, I consider and rebut five objections.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TIMACF
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-08-16
Latest version: 3 (2018-08-17)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-08-16

Total views
7,433 ( #239 of 2,448,227 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1,041 ( #251 of 2,448,227 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.