How to be an Actualist and Blame People

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The actualism/possibilism debate in ethics concerns the relationship between an agent’s free actions and her moral obligations. The actualist affirms, while the possibilist denies, that facts about what agents would freely do in certain circumstances partly determines that agent’s moral obligations. This paper assesses the plausibility of actualism and possibilism in light of desiderata about accounts of blameworthiness. This paper first argues that actualism cannot straightforwardly accommodate certain very plausible desiderata before offering a few independent solutions on behalf of the actualist. This paper then argues that, contrary to initial appearances, possibilism is subject to its own comparably troubling blameworthiness problem.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-01-15
Latest version: 4 (2020-04-09)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
398 ( #16,249 of 2,449,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #9,277 of 2,449,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.