Justice, Thresholds, and the Three Claims of Sufficientarianism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this article, I propose a novel characterization of sufficientarianism. I argue that sufficientarianism combines three claims: a priority claim that we have non-instrumental reasons to prioritize benefits in certain ranges over benefits in other ranges; a continuum claim that at least two of those ranges are on one continuum; and a deficiency claim that the lower a range on a continuum, the more priority benefits in that range have. This characterization of sufficientarianism sheds new light on two long-standing philosophical debates, namely about the distinctiveness of sufficientarianism as a distributive principle and about the common objections to sufficientarianism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-07-05
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #59,319 of 2,454,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #21,122 of 2,454,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.