Sometimes there is nothing wrong with letting a child drown

Analysis 75 (2):204-212 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Peter Singer argues that we’re obligated to donate our entire expendable income to aid organizations. One premiss of his argument is "If it is in your power to prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing anything nearly as important, it is wrong not to do so." Singer defends this by noting that commonsense morality requires us to save a child we find drowning in a shallow pond. I argue that Singer’s Drowning Child thought experiment doesn’t justify this premiss. I offer my own Drowning Children thought experiment, which should reveal that commonsense morality entails that premiss two is actually false
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-01-28
Latest version: 4 (2021-01-07)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
2,867 ( #990 of 2,448,247 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
683 ( #436 of 2,448,247 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.