Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience: Toward an Understanding of Audience—Issues in Argumentation

Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):508-532 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In any field, we might expect different features relevant to its understanding and development to receive attention at different times, depending on the stage of that field’s growth and the interests that occupy theorists and even the history of the theorists themselves. In the relatively young life of argumentation theory, at least as it has formed a body of issues with identified research questions, attention has almost naturally been focused on the central concern of the field—arguments. Focus is also given to the nature of arguers and the position of the evaluator, who is often seen as possessing a “God’s-eye view” (Hamblin 1970). Less attention, however, has been paid in the philosophical literature to the ..
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-17
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
128 ( #33,609 of 55,806 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #33,670 of 55,806 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.