Pornographic Subordination: How Pornography Silences Women

In Claudia F. Card (ed.), Feminist Ethics and Politics. University Press of Kansas (1999)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Making sense of MacKinnon’s claim that pornography silences women requires attention to the discursive and interpretive frameworks that pornography establishes and promotes. Treating pornography as a form of hate speech is promising, but also limited. A close examination of a legal case, in which pornographic images were used to sexually harass, focuses on the hate speech analogy while illustrating the broad and lasting impact of such depictions when targeted at an individual. Applying the distinction between Absolutist and Reclaimer approaches to hate speech and derogatory terms, the article concludes with a discussion of the possibility of creative development of discursive practices within a context that undermines the semantic authority of members of certain groups.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TIRPSH
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-03-14

Total downloads
323 ( #7,727 of 37,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #8,888 of 37,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.