Rule-Consequentialism's Assumptions

Utilitas 30 (4):458-471 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rule-Consequentialism faces “the problem of partial acceptance”: How should the ideal code be selected given the possibility that its rules may not be universally accepted? A new contender, “Calculated Rates” Rule-Consequentialism claims to solve this problem. However, I argue that Calculated Rates merely relocates the partial acceptance question. Nevertheless, there is a significant lesson from this failure of Calculated Rates. Rule-Consequentialism’s problem of partial acceptance is more helpfully understood as an instance of the broader problem of selecting the ideal code given various assumptions—assumptions about who will accept and comply with the rules, but also about how the rules will be taught and enforced, and how similar the future will be. Previous rich discussions about partial acceptance provide a taxonomy and groundwork for formulating the best version of Rule-Consequentialism.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TOBRA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.Peter Railton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.
Global Consequentialism.Pettit, Philip & Smith, Michael

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-02-23

Total downloads
19 ( #34,184 of 37,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #30,112 of 37,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.