The Invisible Thin Red Line

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):354-382 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to argue that the adoption of an unrestricted principle of bivalence is compatible with a metaphysics that (i) denies that the future is real, (ii) adopts nomological indeterminism, and (iii) exploits a branching structure to provide a semantics for future contingent claims. To this end, we elaborate what we call Flow Fragmentalism, a view inspired by Kit Fine (2005)’s non-standard tense realism, according to which reality is divided up into maximally coherent collections of tensed facts. In this way, we show how to reconcile a genuinely A-theoretic branching-time model with the idea that there is a branch corresponding to the thin red line, that is, the branch that will turn out to be the actual future history of the world.
Reprint years
2020
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TORITR
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-02-07
Latest version: 3 (2020-03-18)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-07

Total views
140 ( #38,920 of 2,455,626 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #30,362 of 2,455,626 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.