The Trouble with Pseudoskepticism

Skeptical Inquirer 36 (3) (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The continuing rejection of anthropogenic global warming by non-experts despite overwhelming scientific consensus is rationally untenable and best described as “pseudoskeptical;” it is akin to AIDS denialism, the advocacy of intelligent design, and anti-vaccination movements.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP

314 (#25,866)

6 months
8 (#65,150)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?