Understanding Dogwhistles Politics

Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 36 (3):321-339 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper aims to deepen our understanding of so-called covert dogwhistles. I discuss whether a covert dogwhistle is a specific sort of mechanism of manipulation or whether, on the contrary, it draws on other already familiar linguistic mechanisms such as implicatures or presuppositions. I put forward a series of arguments aimed at illustrating that implicatures and presuppositions, on the one hand, and covert dogwhistles, on the other, differ in their linguistic behaviour concerning plausible deniability, cancellability, calculability and mutual acceptance. I concluded this paper by outlining a simple theory for covert dogwhistles according to which they are attitude-foregrounders.

Author's Profile

José Ramón Torices
University of Granada

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-07

Downloads
375 (#40,513)

6 months
69 (#56,016)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?