Human Extinction, Narrative Ending, and Meaning of Life

Journal of Philosophy of Life 6 (1):1-22 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some people think that the inevitability of human extinction renders life meaningless. Joshua Seachris has argued that naturalism can be conceptualized as a meta-narrative and that it narrates across important questions of human life, including what is the meaning of life and how life will end. How a narrative ends is important, Seachris argues. In the absence of God, and with knowledge that human extinction is a certainty, is there any way that humanity could be meaningful and have a good ending? I will distinguish between two conceptions of how humanity could be meaningful: the traditional view and an alternative view, which I will outline. I will argue that this alternative view provides a plausible explanation for how humanity could become meaningful. I will also argue that coming to terms with our mortality and other limitations would add meaning to human life and provide humanity with a good ending.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TRIHEN
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-04-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-04-25

Total views
336 ( #15,819 of 56,019 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #19,252 of 56,019 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.