How Human Life Could be Unintended but Meaningful: A Reply to Tartaglia

Journal of Philosophy of Life 7 (1):160-179 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The question “What is the meaning of life?” is longstanding and important, but has been shunned by philosophers for decades. Instead, contemporary philosophers have focused on other questions, such as “What gives meaning to the life of a person?” According to James Tartaglia, this research on “meaning in life” is shallow and pointless. He urges philosophers to redirect their attention back to the fundamental question about “meaning of life.” Tartaglia argues that humanity was not created for a purpose and, therefore, is meaningless. He assumes that humanity could not be meaningful unless we were created for a purpose. I will outline a different way that humanity could become meaningful. In addition, I will explain how the research on “meaning in life” is important for understanding how humanity could become meaningful.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TRIHHL
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Are Groups?Ritchie, Katherine

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-07-09

Total views
50 ( #28,193 of 37,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #23,003 of 37,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.