Priority Monism

Philosophy Compass 12 (11):1-10 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to priority monism there are many concrete entities and there is one, the cosmos, that is ontologically prior to all the others. I begin by clarifying this thesis as well as its main rival, priority atomism. I show how the disagreement between the priority monist and atomist ultimately turns on how the thesis of concrete foundationalism is implemented. While it’s standard to interpret priority monism as being metaphysically non-contingent, I show that there are two competing, prima facie plausible conceptions of metaphysical necessity—the essence-based and law-based conceptions—on which it is reasonable to view its modal status differently. This, I suggest, is good for the priority monist—various objections to the thesis presuppose that it’s metaphysically non-contingent, while there are arguments for the thesis that don’t make the presupposition.
Keywords
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TROPM-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-08-13
Latest version: 2 (2017-11-07)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Metaphysical Grounding.Bliss, Ricki & Trogdon, Kelly

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Prioritizing Platonism.Trogdon, Kelly & Cowling, Sam

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-08-13

Total views
149 ( #16,924 of 38,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #20,409 of 38,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.