Attention and memory-driven effects in action studies

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
: We provide empirical examples to conceptually clarify some items on Firestone & Scholl’s (F&S’s) checklist, and to explain perceptual effects from an attentional and memory perspective. We also note that action and embodied cognition studies seem to be most susceptible to misattributing attentional and memory effects as perceptual, and identify four characteristics unique to action studies and possibly responsible for misattributions.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TSEAAM
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-04-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Ecological Laws of Perceiving and Acting: In Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn.Turvey, Michael T.; Shaw, R. E.; Reed, Edward S. & Mace, William M.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-04-05

Total views
101 ( #29,505 of 45,421 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #33,208 of 45,421 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.