Dogmatic Withholding: Confessions of a Serial Offender

In Alexandra Zinke & Verena Wagner (eds.), Suspension in Epistemology and Beyond. Routledge (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter provides an account of what dogmatism is, why the term matters, and how it applies to withholding judgment. Roughly, a person is dogmatic about P when a certain problematic personal investment—a superiority complex, broadly construed—biases their judgment concerning whether P. The term dogmatism and its cognates matter because of their social function. To accuse you of dogmatism is to signal how you are to be treated: your judgment or behavior needs to be “brought down to earth,” so that you have a more accurate view of yourself or so you stop treating others as less important or less than. Withholding judgment can be dogmatic in the same way that belief is dogmatic. Belief (withholding) is dogmatic just when the relevant problematic personal investment results in biases that keep a person stuck in that belief (withholding).

Author's Profile

Chris Tucker
William & Mary

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-01

Downloads
101 (#93,695)

6 months
101 (#62,768)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?