Doomed to fail: the sad epistemological fate

In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological proofs today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 413-422 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
For beings like us, no ontological argument can possibly succeed. They are doomed to fail. The point of an ontological argument is to enable nonempirical knowledge of its conclusion, namely, that God exists. But no ontological argument could possibly enable us to know its conclusion nonempirically, and so must fail in that sense
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-06-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #44,760 of 50,248 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #43,997 of 50,248 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.