Existence and Many-One Identity

Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):313-329 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
C endorses the doctrine of Composition as Identity, which holds that a composite object is identical to its many parts, and entails that one object can be identical to several others. In this dialogue, N argues that many‐one identity, and thus composition as identity, is conceptually confused. In particular, N claims it violates two conceptual truths: that existence facts fix identity facts, and that identity is no addition to being. In response to pressure from C, N considers several candidate interpretations of the first slogan. Each interpretation imagines God issuing a divine existential decree that counts as ‘fixing the existence facts’, and then considers what questions about identity are left open by it. N eventually hits on an appealing interpretation of the slogan that C can neither undermine nor accommodate, and uses it to interpret the second slogan as well
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TUREAM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ordinary Objects.Korman, Daniel Z.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-01-12

Total views
775 ( #4,230 of 48,943 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #15,874 of 48,943 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.