John Stuart Mill on Luck and Distributive Justice

In Ian M. Church & Robert J. Hartman (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck. pp. 80-93 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
My aim in this chapter is to place John Stuart Mill’s distinctive utilitarian political philosophy in the context of the debate about luck, responsibility, and equality. I hope it will reveal the extent to which his utilitarianism provides a helpful framework for synthesizing the competing claims of luck and relational egalitarianism. I attempt to show that when Mill’s distributive justice commitments are not decided by direct appeal to overall happiness, they are guided by three main public principles: an impartiality principle, a sufficiency principle, and a merit principle. The question then becomes how luck and relational considerations figure into his articulation of these public principles. I argue that relational egalitarianism is more fundamental than considerations of luck and responsibility in Mill’s thought, but I also hope to show that any fleshed out picture of Mill’s reform proposals must recognize his condemnation of the role luck plays in determining the distribution of opportunities and outcomes.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TURJSM-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What is the Point of Equality?Anderson, Elizabeth S.
What is Egalitrianism?Scheffler, Samuel
Subject Index.Cohen, G. A.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-03

Total views
217 ( #17,815 of 45,655 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
111 ( #4,998 of 45,655 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.