Art Concept Pluralism

Metaphilosophy 42 (1-2):83-97 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract: There is a long tradition of trying to analyze art either by providing a definition (essentialism) or by tracing its contours as an indefinable, open concept (anti-essentialism). Both art essentialists and art anti-essentialists share an implicit assumption of art concept monism. This article argues that this assumption is a mistake. Species concept pluralism—a well-explored position in philosophy of biology—provides a model for art concept pluralism. The article explores the conditions under which concept pluralism is appropriate, and argues that they obtain for art. Art concept pluralism allows us to recognize that different art concepts are useful for different purposes, and what has been feuding definitions can be seen as characterizations of specific art concepts

Author Profiles

P. D. Magnus
State University of New York, Albany
Christy Mag Uidhir
University of Houston

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-03

Downloads
447 (#34,272)

6 months
72 (#52,924)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?