The moral psychology of Value Sensitive Design: the methodological issues of moral intuitions for responsible innovation

Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (2):186-200 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper argues that although moral intuitions are insufficient for making judgments on new technological innovations, they maintain great utility for informing responsible innovation. To do this, this paper employs the Value Sensitive Design (VSD) methodology as an illustrative example of how stakeholder values can be better distilled to inform responsible innovation. Further, it is argued that moral intuitions are necessary for determining stakeholder values required for the design of responsible technologies. This argument is supported by the claim that the moral intuitions of stakeholders allow designers to conceptualize stakeholder values and incorporate them into the early phases of design. It is concluded that design-for-values (DFV) frameworks like the VSD methodology can remain potent if developers adopt heuristic tools to diminish the influence of cognitive biases thus strengthening the reliability of moral intuitions.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment.Cushman, Fiery; Young, Liane & Hauser, Marc

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
How to Weigh Values in Value Sensitive Design: A Best Worst Method Approach for the Case of Smart Metering.van de Kaa, Geerten; Rezaei, Jafar; Taebi, Behnam; van de Poel, Ibo & Kizhakenath, Abhilash

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
328 ( #12,580 of 47,165 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
117 ( #4,713 of 47,165 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.