Confusion is Corruptive Belief in False Identity

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):204-227 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Speakers are confused about identity if they mistake one thing for two or two things for one. I present two plausible models of confusion, the Frege model and the Millikan model. I show how a prominent objection to Fregean models fails and argue that confusion consists in having false implicit beliefs involving the identity relation. Further, I argue that confused identity has characteristic corruptive effects on singular cognition and on the proper function of singular terms in linguistic communication
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
UNNCIC-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-02-11
Latest version: 6 (2017-11-01)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Real Patterns.Dennett, Daniel C.
The Varieties of Reference.Antony, Louise M.; Evans, Gareth & McDowell, John
Quantifying In.Kaplan, David

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-02-11

Total downloads
199 ( #12,942 of 37,125 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #9,875 of 37,125 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.