Coercion and Justice

American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this article, I develop a new account of the liberal view that principles of justice are meant to justify state coercion, and consider its implications for the question of global socioeconomic justice. Although contemporary proponents of this view deny that principles of socioeconomic justice apply globally, on my newly developed account this conclusion is mistaken. I distinguish between two types of coercion, systemic and interactional, and argue that a plausible theory of global justice should contain principles justifying both. The justification of interactional coercion requires principles regulating interstate interference; that of systemic coercion requires principles of global socioeconomic justice. I argue that the proposed view not only helps us make progress in the debate on global justice, but also offers an independently compelling and systematic account of the function and conditions of applicability of justice. -/-
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VALCAG
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-05-25

Total views
214 ( #24,599 of 56,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #22,161 of 56,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.