Enforcement Rights Against Non‐Culpable Non‐Just Intrusion

Ratio 24 (4):422-442 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I articulate and defend a principle governing enforcement rights in response to a non‐culpable non‐just rights‐intrusion (e.g., wrongful bodily attack by someone who falsely, but with full epistemic justification, believes that he is acting permissibly). The account requires that the use of force reduce the harm from such intrusions and is sensitive to the extent to which the intruder is agent‐responsible for imposing intrusion‐harm.

Author's Profile

Peter Vallentyne
University of Missouri, Columbia

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-10

Downloads
430 (#52,771)

6 months
99 (#56,448)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?