'Beyond consensus? A Reply to Alan Irwin.'

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (10):48-53 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a rejoinder to Alan Irwin's constructive response "Agreeing to Differ?" to our (2017) paper. We zoom in on the three main issues Irwin raises, namely (a) How to understand consensus? (b) Why are so many public participation activities consensus-driven? (c) Should we not value the art of closure, of finding ways to make agreements, particularly in view of the dire state of world politics today? We use this opportunity to highlight and further develop some of our ideas.

Author's Profile

Jeroen Van Bouwel
Ghent University

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-10

Downloads
220 (#63,811)

6 months
41 (#83,265)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?